Technical agility
Technical agility is an enabling condition for process agility: a team may want to be agile and have the best intentions, but if its code is hard to modify, if it has no automated tests, or if its deployments are slow and risky, process agility cannot work well.
Supporting practices
The engineering practices most directly associated with technical agility come mainly from Extreme Programming (XP):
- Continuous integration: code changes are integrated into the main branch frequently, running automated tests with every integration. It detects conflicts and errors early.
- Test-driven development (TDD): tests are written before production code. It guarantees coverage from day one.
- Refactoring: continuous improvement of the internal structure of the code without changing its external behavior. It prevents the accumulation of technical debt.
- Pair programming: two developers work together on the same code, improving quality and spreading knowledge.
- Peer review: review of the code by another team member before integrating it.
- Continuous deployment: automation of the delivery process all the way to production, reducing the risk of each deployment.
Technical agility with AI
Generative AI tools are changing the practice of technical agility:
- Code assistants (GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and similar tools) speed up code writing and test generation. Teams with a solid foundation in technical agility—automated tests and clear quality standards—can take advantage of these tools more safely, because they have mechanisms to detect when the generated code does not meet those standards.
- AI-assisted review: language models can help in code review by detecting problematic patterns. They do not replace human review, but they can act as a first filter.
- Technical debt and generated code: the massive use of code generators can increase technical debt if the team does not review rigorously. Refactoring and quality standards become more important, not less, when part of the code is generated by an AI.
A team that uses AI to generate code without automated tests or structured review is accumulating technical debt faster than before. Technical agility is not optional when working with code generators: it is the safety net that makes those tools useful instead of dangerous.
Common mistake
Confusing technical agility with adopting a process framework. Using Scrum does not automatically make a team technically agile. Technical agility requires investment in specific engineering practices: testing, refactoring, continuous integration. Without that investment, the agile process produces low-quality increments that pile up as technical debt.
See also
Do you want to advance in agility? You can look for course and exam calls or go at your own pace by becoming a member of the Agile Club. This membership includes exclusive resources, e-learning classrooms, and access to Skill Arena: a space to practice and measure your agile skills at your own pace.